Its All in My Head and I Think About It Over and Over Again and It Hurts So Bad
Hollywood seems determined to profit from remakes and sequels that movie makers have no business writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working hard to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for example — the bigwigs of the American film industry are on a mission to quickly ruin whatever remnant of millennial childhood nostalgia.
And so, information technology is with a heavy heart — and in recognition that January ten, 2022, marks six years since the passing of the absolutely legendary and incomparable David Bowie — that I am forced to accost the announcement of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original pic require, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the atomic number 82 thespian from the original film prepared to brand an appearance? Is the original director still bachelor? The answer to these questions is a single, resounding "NO." And however, hither we are. Sigh.
Allow me to take a brief moment to talk over why a Labyrinth sequel is an awful, terrible, no-adept thought.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Will Be a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, it'southward going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin King — a.k.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-angle stone star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His failing health was a well-kept clandestine, and fans and admirers from all over the earth mourned his untimely passing.
If you believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more than a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the entire project, I'd recommend that you go back and sentinel the original 1986 film. Bowie's presence extends beyond his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and absurd charismatic demeanor — the human as well wrote and performed more one-half of the picture's soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform equally Jareth is much like watching him as Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to divide the truth from the fiction of these performances, as Bowie becomes and so engrossed in his characterization that he simply ceases to be himself. Even as an adult, it's difficult to watch Jareth the Goblin Male monarch prance, trip the light fantastic and sing without occasionally stopping to think, "Wow. That really is David Bowie. And, aye, I will 'Dance the Magic Dance' down my hallway."
I'm sorry, but it's impossible for a casting managing director to find a multitalented actor/musician to fill Bowie'south shoes in an upcoming sequel. Information technology's also a challenge to imagine any viable reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin King would have suddenly changed course. This type of confusion only deepens when considering what might go of the Labyrinth's creatures.
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth film. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched by rival puppeteers, and in a time without impressive CGI graphics, he was one of the become-to guys for applied special effects. Sadly, Henson passed away in 1990. Since that fourth dimension, there have been no less than v theatrical releases with his charming Muppet characters — and they've all been awful.
Some might take those movies equally a sign that Henson's absence is no large deal when attempting to brand a sequel. They would be incredibly wrong. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would be like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't you dare, 20th Century Fox!) Just stop thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what it is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth film without using Henson's puppets would be like George Lucas abandoning practical puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated computer graphics. Oh…that's already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who take grown up watching a specific pic are bound to experience slighted, misunderstood or but plainly cheated when that film ends up lost in technological translation.
Not convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Take a look at how The Panthera leo King fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "alive-action"' Disney remake. Hither'due south a spoiler: They didn't similar it.
A Projection Fueled by Profits, Not Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives dark-green-lighting so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the answer lies in nostalgia-based profit. Academics have long studied consumer beliefs, and it seems that recent studies have non fallen on deaf ears.
In 2014, the Journal of Consumer Enquiry published findings on the connection between nostalgia and money-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or nostalgic. Advertising executives and film producers accept taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That'south why our current film manufacture is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, particularly to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are now total-fledged adults with existential dread about the future as climatic change, pandemics and political anarchy exit generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
Merely rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (think Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the film industry would rather take existing intellectual property and rebrand it for the younger generation. In nearly cases, the result is an alienated original audience and a disinterested youth. This is all done in the name of and for the sake of profit.
So Please, Leave This Gem of a Picture Lonely
A moving picture shouldn't exist pre-judged equally good or bad, of grade, but should instead be judged by its merit, reception and lasting bear on. Still, even the most advanced hologram technology could not revive Bowie'southward onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD IT). And no amount of CGI could replace the authenticity and wonder of Henson's creations.
The only thing that could remain consistent between the original Labyrinth pic and its proposed sequel is its primary screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and celebrity). But equally of this moment, there'due south no word from the aging Brit as to his possible involvement in writing a sequel.
As a result, in that location'due south little hope that a Labyrinth ii would be anything more a shameless, soulless cash grab aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger earth that lay before them during the '80s. Whatever project based on profit, non passion, is doomed to neglect, and that's why I'm not looking forward to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies ahead.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
Posting Komentar untuk "Its All in My Head and I Think About It Over and Over Again and It Hurts So Bad"